Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Int Heart J ; 63(2): 388-392, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1822305

ABSTRACT

CoronaVac is an inactivated coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine that was granted an emergency authorization by the World Health Organization in June 2021. We present the two cases of patients presenting with chest pain, abnormal electrocardiography, and elevated troponin consistent with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 24 hours after receiving the CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , COVID-19 , Viral Vaccines , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
2.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0249043, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1146693

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Tele-HF Clinic (Tele-HFC) program on cardiovascular death, heart failure (HF) rehospitalization, and heart transplantation rates in a cohort of ambulatory HF patients during and after the peak of the pandemic. METHODS: Using the HF clinic database, we compared data of patients with HF before, during, and after the peak of the pandemic (January 1 to March 17 [pre-COVID], March 17 to May 31 [peak-COVID], and June 1 to October 1 [post-COVID]). During peak-COVID, all patients were managed by Tele-HFC or hospitalization. After June 1, patients chose either a face-to-face clinic visit or a continuous tele-clinic visit. RESULTS: Cardiovascular death and medical titration rates were similar in peak-COVID compared with all other periods. HF readmission rates were significantly lower in peak-COVID (8.7% vs. 2.5%, p<0.001) and slightly increased (3.5%) post-COVID. Heart transplant rates were substantially increased in post-COVID (4.5% vs. peak-COVID [0%], p = 0.002). After June 1, 38% of patients continued with the Tele-HFC program. Patients managed by the Tele-HFC program for <6 months were less likely to have HF with reduced ejection fraction (73% vs. 54%, p = 0.005) and stage-D HF (33% vs. 14%, p = 0.001), and more likely to achieve the target neurohormonal blockade dose (p<0.01), compared with the ≥6-month Tele-HFC group. CONCLUSIONS: HF rehospitalization and transplant rates significantly declined during the pandemic in ambulatory care of HF. However, reduction in these rates did not affect subsequent 5-month hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in the setting of Tele-HFC program and continuum of advanced HF therapies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/pathology , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care Facilities , COVID-19/virology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Databases, Factual , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Transplantation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL